In my interviews and discussions with members of the opposition, the subject of Manuel Rosales occasionally comes up. Their typical response is a rolling back of the eyes and a waving off with a hand. Recently, I asked one of them what he thought of Rosales and he simply replied, "un perdedor" (a loser). When he lost in the landslide defeat in 2006, he embarrassed the opposition again and ended up as the mayor of Marcaibo, a post which he abandoned when he was charged with corruption. He is former governor of the State of Zulia, a hotbed for the opposition on the Colombian border and more recently he held the post of a mayor. Typical of opposition candidates, Rosales' political platform has always been planked with unwarranted negative attacks on the government, offering nothing positive for the future of Venezuela. 

In early April of this year, Salim Lamrani, an eminent Parisian scholar and analyst on Latin American affairs, wrote about Rosales:

"He is suspected of corruption and unjustified enrichment during his mandate as governor of the state of Zulia between 2002 and 2004. Rosales, whose trial was transferred to Caracas (because he had met with four judges of the state of Zulia), is suspected, amongst others of:

• donating to relatives and friends more than 300 vehicles that belonged to the State;
  
  
• starting businesses in Miami whose assets surpass US$ 11 million; and
  
  
• taking bribes from the German enterprise Siemens for the construction of the Maracaibo subway. The said multinational corporation acknowledged having paid certain amounts in order to obtain the contract, without mentioning any name, however."

Prosecutors have been focusing on corruption in government, charging a number of past and current officials with related crimes - indeed, a serious problem in Venezuela as it is in all countries. Among those charged is Carlos Giménez who was politically affiliated with President Chávez and removed from office in 2008. Rather than answering to the charges against him in court, Rosales went on the lam and ended up in Peru, where the U.S.-backed regime of Alan Garcia has now given him asylum on the pretext that he is the victim of a drive to eliminate political opponents of President Chávez. This, of course, makes good press for the rabid Venezuelan opposition and the anti-Chávez western media. But truth to tell, Rosales never representated any real political threat to the elected government or to President Chávez, politically or personally. Manuel Rosales appears to be no more or less than a common, white-collar criminal who got caught with his hand in the taxpayer's pocket like so many politicians in the U.S.

Rosales should be prosecuted and if convicted, should be sitting in a Venezuelan jail. This story says as much about the corruption of Alan Garcia's regime in Peru as it says about the thieves they are protecting. The cornerstone of the perfect crime is getting away with it. The way to do it in Venezuela is to claim persecution by the government and to flee to Peru or Miami where political asylum is for sale. But if you're interested in following suit, you better take some money with you. It looks like Manuel Rosales had as much as $11 million salted away in Miami for just that occasion.

Source: http://axisoflogic.com/artman/publish/Article_55637.shtml

Original article published on 1 May 2009

About the author

Les Blough is a good friend of Tlaxcala, the network of translators for linguistic diversity. This original piece may be reprinted as long as the content remains unaltered, and the source and author are cited.

URL of this article on Tlaxcala: http://www.tlaxcala.es/pp.asp?reference=7548&lg=en